Abstract 67
Abdul Samad. K
Abdul Samad. K
Archetypes
restructured; the creation of dissent in Pathmarajan’s movies.
Abstract
Presenting
rebellious spirits have been a great fascination for all creative talents. All
such dissenting voices were sidelined by the all-pleasing cultural productions
which succeeded in manufacturing consent. In the tinsel world, technology and
its inherent politics have made dissenting traditions a thing of the past. The
failure is on two levels; at one hand technological body has replaced the
representation of dissent and on the other hand the methods of dissent have
failed to please the theatergoers. Main stream cultural productions have
exhaustively used all sources of human traditions. With advanced technology, it
merges with the subconscious images of the individual and the collective. Any
analysis of contemporary films will help us to see that all forms of hegemony
have been rooted in our individual/collective unconscious and to get out of it
is to ‘destruct the visual pleasure’.
How can any art form survive without the pleasure it is supposed to
impart? Can we leave all our traditional patterns at the mercy of the
dominating images which manufacture consent?
This paper is an attempt to see
how Pathmarajan, popular middle stream film maker of Kerala, has succeeded in
restructuring the subconscious images and developed a method of dissent which was innovative and imparted
pleasure to the theatergoers. Based on a few selected works including Njan
Gandarvan, Namukku Parkkan Munthirithoppukal etc… the paper elaborates on
how the dissenting voices found its place in the film without destructing
visual pleasure. It is remarkable to note that he has extensively used all
forms traditional archetypal patterns of the collective unconscious in his work
but has refused to be subdued by the medium and its over hegemonic discourses.
No comments:
Post a Comment